Saturday, 25 June 2016

Carnation (video) and Arches Hot Press paper test

In my previous post I discussed briefly my most helpful reds. This time I would like to take a closer look at Arches HP paper. I used this paper to paint a carnation which I finished yesterday:

It was last year or even a year before when someone gave me Arches HP paper for testing. I did some tests, very simple tests, which already showed that Arches HP would not be my favorite paper. I don't know if I got a bad batch then or I had a bad time but painting on Arches HP was just terrible. 

Some time ago I got a block of Arches HP again. It was on my drawer for quite a long time but I decided to see how it would work for me now. I know there have been some issues with Fabriano Artistico paper lately and many botanical artist test other papers. I personally still love Fabriano and I have never had any problems with it.

Oh, speaking about Fabriano. Some of you probably have seen the video made by Eunike Nugroho (this video). Two spots came out on the paper while she was painting. I don't know if it is connected anyhow, but two weeks ago I started drawing zendalas on Fabriano Artistico (you can see 3 videos if you like: zendala 1, zendala 2, zendala 3). When I looked at a sheet of Fabriano against the light to check a watermark I noticed white round spots. It immediately reminded me of Eunike's spots. So maybe it's worth checking if there are those spots before we start painting. I can't check if this spot would somehow affect the painting because I have a zendala there. Just a little observation.

Let's come back to Arches. I used this block:

Before I started to paint a carnation I did some color tests. I also wanted to practise before I start something more serious. What I noticed was that on Arches paper paint didn't cover an area evenly. The colors looked as if they had been covered with a chalk. It is probably not really clear in the photos, but here is Arches:

and here is Fabriano Artistico:

On Fabriano colors seem to be stronger and washes are more even. This upset me, because I remember similar situation with Winsor&Newton CP paper. 

I did more practice and it turned out that when I applied more water at the beginning (much more water) the washes later looked really good and even. It seems that Arches likes water.

Arches is also a very smooth paper, much smoother than Saunders Waterford HP. The only thing I can complain about is the creamy color of Arches. Fabriano Artistico Extra White is really extra white next to Arches


I surprised myself and I really like Arches. 
  • The colors eventually look really well, they are very bright and strong, just as I like. 
  • Painting wet-on-wet is really nice, paint spreads out evenly with a soft edge. 
  • It is easy to lift out the paint as well. 
  • Edges are crisp. 
  • The surface is very smooth.
  • The paper cockles less than Fabriano Artistico
  • As I mentioned before, the only thing that I can complain about is the color of the paper, but it doesn't bother me much. 
All in all, I think it's a very good paper. Painting on it is a pleasure and it can be a good alternative to other papers if there's a need. I'm very happy with my painting on Arches. The flower is 20 cm high (8").


In case you were interested in colors which I used:
I've also made a video of how I was painting it. It's in to parts: part 1, part 2.

Thursday, 23 June 2016

Looking for the right reds

Two days ago I started a small painting of a red carnation. At the beginning I was quite sure I would use mostly Winsor Red PR254 to paint it but then I realized that I got stuck in a trap of coming back to the same red every time. Whenever I had to paint something red, the first red that came to my mind was always Winsor Red. This time it turned out that the red I needed was completely different from Winsor Red. And what's worse - I didn't have the right one on my palette. 

At firt, I started to mix colors which I had on my palette. I thought maybe this time I would try the optical mixing method. I decided to test Arches HP paper (this will be the subject of another post). I painted spots of different colors: Permanent Rose, Translucent Orange, Quinacridone Red, Winsor Red, Perylene Maroon and Quinacridone Magenta. Once they dried, I applied the second layer of Winsor Red and I checked out what I got:

I got various reds, but none of them was even close to the one I was looking for. So I opened my box with paints and I took my color swatches. It turned out that among my tubes of watercolors I had Pyrrole Red Light which I had opened only once when I painted a swatch. I looked at the swatch and... it was exactly what I was looking for!

Saturday, 4 June 2016

Billy Showell's new book!

Today's post is all about Billy Showell's new book "Botanical Painting in Watercolour". I was given it as a birthday gift and I was really, really surprised, because I'd been waiting for this book since I'd learned about it but my online bookstore says that the premiere is to be on July. But I already have it!

Of course I spent all day yesterday reading it and admiring all those beautiful paintings inside. I have all four books by Billy and all of them are just pure perfection. The newest one is no exception. 

For me Billy is very special because I started my botanical journey from her book "A-Z of Flower Portraits". It is the only book about botanical painting here in Poland and of course still the only one in Polish. I learned so much from it and I was eager to learn more so I bought her other books abroad + two DVDs. Every time I learned something new and my paintings were getting better. 

"Botanical Painting in Watercolour" is Billy's fourth book and I thought nothing would surprise me. But it did. I found new tips, new techniques, new information which I will definitely implement in my paintings.

The book has 192 pages and it's square which is very nice change. There are dozens of excellent photos inside. I love every single book by Billy because they are very neat and all photos and illustrations are of very high quality so it's very easy to see details and understand everything. Not to mention, that there are many photos of each stage and they are described in concise language, without unnecessary details. The language is easy to understand even for non-native-English speakers like me.

The content is divided into 16 chapters + Introduction, Glossary and Index. Each page is beautifully decorated with Billy's paintings or, as in the first chapter, photos of materials. The chapters are: Materials, Getting started, Working from life, Observation, Drawing, Using brush, Painting techniques, Troubleshooting, Painting detail, Adding pattern, Creating texture, Painting multi-headed flowers, Painting from enlarged photographs, Colour and colour mixing, Composition, Stretching and finishing.

Billy provides us with a lot of useful information, such as how to keep fresh items fresh, how to observe a plant, how to transfer a sketch onto watercolor paper, how to stretch paper and so on. 

The heart of the book for me is the techniques of painting. Billy explains everything very clearly showing us everything on the photos. This book is like a great encyclopedia of watercolor techniques useful in botanical painting. 

We learn how to use a brush properly, what effects we can achieve, what obstacles can occur and how to deal with them. I specially like the "Adding pattern" and "Creating texture" chapters. The first one begins with stunning roses with lovely pattern.

We can also find information about colors. The chapter is divided into several parts, each part is dedicated to different colors. The one shown below is about blacks.

I think that this book is just excellent for everyone, specially those who wants to start painting in botanical style. All the neccessary information can be found there. I would recommend this book to everyone without a second thought.

Here's my "Billy's collection". Unfortunately, Polish edition of "A-Z of Flower Portraits" looks terrible when compared with English edition and I think I will buy English edition because it's really worth it.